Governance Overview¶
FCC includes a built-in governance framework that ensures documentation quality, compliance, and traceability without requiring deep technical knowledge to understand. This page explains what governance means in FCC and how it works for team leads and stakeholders.
Quality Gates¶
Quality gates are automated checkpoints that verify documentation artifacts meet defined standards before they can move to the next phase or be published.
How Quality Gates Work¶
Each quality gate has:
- An ID (e.g.,
QG-RC-001) that uniquely identifies the gate - A persona it applies to (e.g., RC for Research Crafter)
- A threshold (0.0 to 1.0) that defines the minimum pass score
- A list of checks that must be satisfied
When a persona produces an artifact, the framework evaluates it against the persona's quality gates. If the checks pass at or above the threshold, the artifact proceeds. If not, the artifact is flagged for remediation.
Severity Levels¶
Validation results use four severity levels:
| Severity | Meaning | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Error | Critical failure -- artifact cannot proceed | Must fix before moving forward |
| Warning | Significant issue -- should be addressed | Fix before publication, may proceed in draft |
| Info | Minor observation -- consider addressing | Optional improvement |
| Critical | System-level failure -- blocks all progress | Immediate attention required |
Example Quality Gates¶
| Gate ID | Name | Persona | What It Checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| QG-RC-001 | Research Inventory Completeness | RC | Capability matrix, annotated references, traceability matrix, capability tags |
| QG-BC-001 | Blueprint Completeness | BC | Architecture diagrams, API specifications, data models, workflow definitions |
| QG-DE-001 | Documentation Quality | DE | Style guide compliance, version control, review report |
| QG-AMS-001 | Anti-fact Mitigation Rigor | AMS | Confidence thresholds applied, source verification, audit trail |
The framework includes 25 quality gates covering all 24 personas plus one universal gate (QG-RISCEAR-001) that validates R.I.S.C.E.A.R. completeness across all personas.
Capability Tags¶
Tags categorize every persona and capability using a three-level hierarchy:
For example:
strategy-alignment / knowledge-sharing / persona-research-crafteroperational-excellence / integration-automation / persona-blueprint-validatorstrategy-alignment / governance-compliance / governance-quality-gates
Tags serve three purposes:
- Discovery -- Find personas and capabilities by category
- Reporting -- Aggregate metrics by supercategory or category
- Compliance -- Verify all required capabilities are covered
The tag registry (data/governance/tag_registry.yaml) contains 30 tags organized across five categories: knowledge-sharing, integration-automation, governance-compliance, stakeholder-engagement, and champion-orchestration.
Governance Personas¶
Three personas are specifically designed for governance functions:
DGS -- Data Governance Specialist¶
Manages integration between documentation systems and data governance ecosystems. Ensures API contracts, data flows, and service configurations align with governance policies. Operates across all FCC phases.
Key outputs: Integration configurations, data flow documentation, compliance reports.
PTE -- Privacy Taxonomy Engineer¶
Designs data classification taxonomies aligned with privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.). Implements hierarchical classification schemes with defined sensitivity levels.
Key outputs: Classification taxonomies, privacy policy documentation, classification reports.
AMS -- Anti-fact Mitigation Specialist¶
Ensures AI-generated content is factually grounded. Validates claims against authoritative sources using confidence thresholds:
| Confidence Level | Range | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High | >= 0.95 | Auto-accept with audit log |
| Medium | 0.80 - 0.94 | Requires manual review |
| Low | 0.60 - 0.79 | Requires source citation |
| Reject | < 0.60 | Rejected, flagged for rewrite |
Key outputs: Validated content with confidence scores, confidence reports, audit trails.
How Governance Flows Through FCC¶
Governance is not a separate step -- it is embedded in the FCC cycle:
- Find phase: DGS provides governance context, STE ensures terminology consistency, TS tracks traceability
- Create phase: PTE classifies data sensitivity, BC and RB produce governance-compliant artifacts
- Critique phase: AMS validates factual accuracy, BV checks blueprint quality, GCA audits overall compliance
- Publication: SCP enforces access controls, CO coordinates handoffs, quality gates block non-compliant content
Next Steps¶
- Quality Gates Tutorial -- Configure custom quality gates
- Workflow Selection -- Choose a workflow with appropriate governance depth
- Scaling Guide -- Deploy governance across multiple projects