FCC for Data Architects¶
Welcome to the For Data Architects section of the FCC Agent Team Framework documentation. This section is written for the people who decide how data moves through FCC: how entities are modelled, how vocabularies are reconciled across ecosystem projects, how federated identities resolve, and how lineage is captured end-to-end.
If you are here to integrate an application, start with
For Developers. If you are deploying FCC
at scale, start with For Operators. If you
are evaluating compliance posture, start with
For Auditors. This section assumes you have
already completed the Getting Started
walk-through and can run fcc validate --personas on a local checkout.
Who This Section Is For¶
Your role
This section assumes you are responsible for one or more of the following:
- Designing the object model that FCC and its sister projects share
- Curating vocabulary mappings between FCC and external ontologies (CTO, AOME, FIBO, HL7 FHIR, ACORD, DCAT, CIM)
- Standing up federation topologies across multiple ecosystem projects and namespaces
- Defining per-persona
data_flowfrontmatter to close quality gateQG-DGS-001 - Producing data lineage evidence for audit and compliance review
If any of those fit, the four guides in this section will take you from reading the FCC object model to extending it safely for your organisation.
Overview of Data-Architect-Specific Content¶
| Guide | Primary Focus | When to Read |
|---|---|---|
| Object Model Overview | Protocol-based Repository[T] + ModelFacade + EvolutionStage |
Before designing a custom facade |
| Vocabulary Mappings | 95 packaged cross-vocabulary mappings across 20 YAML files | Before wiring a new ecosystem project |
| Federation Patterns | EntityResolver + NamespaceRegistry + cross-project resolution |
Before onboarding a second namespace |
| Data Governance | data_flow persona frontmatter + quality gate QG-DGS-001 |
Before running a compliance audit |
Each guide links back to the source under src/fcc/objectmodel/,
src/fcc/federation/, and src/fcc/data/objectmodel/.
Quick-Start for Data Architects¶
Adopting the FCC object model is a five-step process. Most data architects complete it in one working week.
Step 1: Read the Protocol Contracts¶
Open src/fcc/objectmodel/base.py and confirm you are comfortable
with typing.Protocol and runtime_checkable. The DomainEntity and
RepositoryProtocol[T] contracts are structural — any frozen
dataclass with an id and a to_dict() satisfies them, without
inheritance.
Step 2: Inventory Your Source Vocabulary¶
List the entities, attributes, and relationships in your source vocabulary. For every entity you expect to federate, capture the identifier, the human-readable name, and at least one FCC anchor (usually a persona, action, or workflow).
Step 3: Draft a Repository¶
Use ExampleRepository at src/fcc/objectmodel/examples.py as a
reference implementation. Your repository needs add, get_by_id,
get_all, count, __iter__, __len__, __contains__. That is
it.
Step 4: Wire a Facade¶
Subclass ModelFacade and implement stats(), search(), and
get_full(). A facade is how your repositories are exposed to the
rest of FCC — simulations, CLI dashboards, and RAG pipelines all
consume the facade, not the repository directly.
Step 5: Register a Namespace and Map Vocabularies¶
Add a namespace to
src/fcc/data/federation/namespace_registry.yaml and draft vocabulary
mappings in src/fcc/data/objectmodel/<your-project>_vocabulary_mappings.yaml
following the pattern in
Vocabulary Mappings.
Decision Tree: If You Need X, Go To Y¶
Use this tree to pick your first guide.
flowchart TD
Start([What do you need most?]) --> Kind{What kind of work?}
Kind -->|Design a new facade| OM[Object Model Overview]
Kind -->|Map an external vocabulary| VM[Vocabulary Mappings]
Kind -->|Connect two ecosystem projects| FP[Federation Patterns]
Kind -->|Close QG-DGS-001| DG[Data Governance]
classDef start fill:#e1f5ff,stroke:#0277bd,stroke-width:2px;
classDef decision fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px;
classDef result fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px;
class Start start;
class Kind decision;
class OM,VM,FP,DG result;
Data Architect Maturity Model¶
| Stage | Signals | Typical Duration | Next Investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploring | Reading the object model, no custom facade | 1-2 weeks | Draft a minimal ExampleRepository clone |
| Piloting | 1 facade, 1 vocabulary mapping file, manual audit | 2-6 weeks | Wire EntityResolver across 2 namespaces |
| Operating | 3+ facades, 5+ mapping files, automated data_flow |
2-6 months | Federated KG, change-tracking |
| Scaling | Multi-project federation, cross-ecosystem lineage | 6+ months | Evidence graph + cross-regulation reporting |
Related Sections¶
- For Developers — integration and API surface
- For Architects — system-level design choices
- For Operators — deployment and scaling
- For Auditors — compliance and evidence
- For Knowledge Engineers — ontology engineering and knowledge graphs
v1.4.x What's New for Data Architects¶
v1.4.x adds two changes you should know about. First, the
Zachman 6×6 cross-cut (v1.4.1) classifies every persona into
one of 36 cells; for data architects this becomes a second
dimension to organise persona data_flow frontmatter (now also
tied to cell affinity). Second, the ice_ext element-mapping
YAML is vendored into src/fcc/data/objectmodel/, joining the
175+ existing vocabulary mappings, and ice_ext is promoted to
Tier-1-Strict POLARIS in the ecosystem registry. Both changes
are downstream-visible via the VDS SHA-256 drift gate.
- Guidebook Ch. 35 — Zachman Coevolution —
the cross-cut that now organises your
data_flowconsiderations. - Guidebook Ch. 31 — SAFe Adoption in FCC — portfolio-level view of data-governance epics.
- Guidebook Ch. 32 — Dual-Bus Event Model — data-flow implications of the UX lane.
- Sample Prompts — Data-Flow Zachman Overlay
- Sample Prompts — v1.4.x Vocabulary Drift Audit
- docs/safe/README.md — delegation value stream that owns vocabulary additions.
- docs/ecosystem/alignment-status.md — 19-project vocabulary-coverage dashboard.
- Notebook
43_zachman_cross_cut.ipynb— applying the Zachman cross-cut to data-flow analysis.