DRAFT — not legal advice. For counsel review only. All content in
docs/patent/is AI-authored from the public FCC codebase and public prior-art search results. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice. Do not file any document on the basis of this package without attorney sign-off.v1.4.3 delegation notice (2026-04-22): The FCC ecosystem is consolidating all patent material at ai-coe-docs (PHOENIX) under
docs/patent/<codename>/. FCC's own tree will mirror toai-coe-docs/docs/patent/fcc/as the authoritative single source of truth. Migration PR is user-approval-gated per/home/bobbie_d/.claude/plans/create-multi-stage-plan-breezy-thompson.md. Until the migration PR merges, this tree remains the authoritative FCC-side draft. After migration, this README becomes a redirect sentinel + drift-check only.
- Delegation runbook:
../governance/patent-delegation-runbook.md- Cross-repo coordination record:
../ecosystem/README.md- Drift CI:
.github/workflows/patent-mirror-check.yml(advisory through v1.4.3.x; promoted to required in v1.4.4+)- Owner: Innovation Handoff Liaison (IHL persona, v1.4.3 addition)
FCC Patent Package¶
This tree contains the full draft utility-patent package for the Find → Create → Critique (FCC) Agent Team Framework, owned by INFORMATION COLLECTIVE, LLC. It is authored for the v1.3.9 patent-centric milestone and is READY for counsel review. Actual filing is out of scope — that requires patent counsel engagement.
Scope¶
The package supports a single U.S. utility-patent filing pathway:
- Provisional application (12-month priority anchor) — see
provisional/. - Non-provisional utility application (expanded, claims-focused) — see
utility/. - Freedom-to-operate analysis (per-claim risk register) — see
fto/.
International (PCT) routing is a downstream decision for counsel and is noted but not drafted here.
Primary invention statement¶
The FCC framework's novel contributions, as claimed in this package:
- R.I.S.C.E.A.R. 10-element persona specification (Role, Inputs, Style, Constraints, Expected output, Archetype, Responsibilities, Role Skills, Role Collaborators, Role Adoption Checklist) unifying prior persona systems and role-based agent frameworks under a single machine-enforceable schema.
- Find → Create → Critique workflow graph with plugin-based extension points across 11 plugin types (personas, engines, templates, scorers, validators, providers, governance, scenarios, workflows, subscribers, vocabulary_providers).
- Cross-project vocabulary provider plugin pattern —
VocabularyProviderPluginenabling federated entity resolution against packaged YAML mappings without runtime coupling between projects. - Constitution registry with 3-tier governance (hard-stop / mandatory / preferred) applied per-persona as a pre-inference policy gate.
- Discernment Matrix × Design Target Factors evaluation — 6 traits × 7 rating dimensions + 6 factors × 7 dimensions for super-connector persona recognition and persona quality gating.
- Hybrid persona audit (strict R.I.S.C.E.A.R. completeness + open-science template presence) as a continuous-integration gate that a machine can enforce at commit time.
Counsel contact¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary counsel | TBD — to be engaged |
| Firm | TBD |
| Engagement date | TBD |
| Matter number | TBD |
| Inventor liaison | INFORMATION COLLECTIVE, LLC — rollingthunderfourtytwo@gmail.com |
Filing checklist¶
- IDF review — Review
disclosure/invention-disclosure-form.md. Confirm inventorship, prior public disclosures (including GitHub commits, PyPI releases, and docs-site content), and funding sources. - Prior-art landscape reviewed — Review
prior-art/landscape.mdandprior-art/search-report.md. Cross-check with counsel's preferred patent-search vendor (e.g., Questel Orbit, PatSnap, Clarivate Derwent). - Provisional application drafted — Review
provisional/specification.md,provisional/abstract.md, andprovisional/claims.md. Confirm 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) written-description, enablement, and best-mode compliance. - Claims reviewed by counsel — Review
utility/claims.md. Confirm Alice/Mayo § 101 eligibility posture per USPTO 2024/2025 AI/ML guidance (technological-improvement articulation). - FTO assessed — Review
fto/analysis.mdandfto/risk-register.md. Confirm no identified blocking prior art at independent-claim level. - Drawings finalized — Review
drawings/README.md. Confirm the 4+1 UML views + C4 context diagram are suitable as FIG. 1 through FIG. 6. Have draftsperson render in USPTO-compliant black-and-white line art (37 CFR 1.84). - Oath/declaration and inventorship entity — Confirm INFORMATION COLLECTIVE, LLC as assignee; confirm small-entity or micro-entity status for fee reduction.
- File via USPTO EFS-Web (pro se) or via licensed attorney — Recommend licensed attorney given § 101 and AI-invention sensitivities.
- Post-filing — Docket 12-month provisional-to-nonprovisional conversion deadline. Decide PCT routing before the 12-month mark.
Status matrix¶
| Sub-document | Path | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | README.md |
This file | DRAFT |
| Invention Disclosure Form | disclosure/invention-disclosure-form.md |
Structured IDF for counsel | DRAFT |
| Prior-art landscape | prior-art/landscape.md |
10-15 candidate prior-art documents, per-item distinguishing analysis | DRAFT |
| Prior-art search report | prior-art/search-report.md |
Queries, sources, shortlisting methodology | DRAFT |
| Provisional abstract | provisional/abstract.md |
150-word USPTO abstract | DRAFT |
| Provisional specification | provisional/specification.md |
Full provisional (8-12k words) | DRAFT |
| Provisional claims | provisional/claims.md |
10-20 provisional claims | DRAFT |
| Utility specification | utility/specification.md |
Expanded utility (12-18k words) | DRAFT |
| Utility claims | utility/claims.md |
3-5 independent + 20-30 dependent | DRAFT |
| FTO analysis | fto/analysis.md |
Per-claim FTO | DRAFT |
| FTO risk register | fto/risk-register.md |
Conflicts + mitigations | DRAFT |
| Drawings README | drawings/README.md |
Pointer to 4+1 UML + C4 source figures | DRAFT |
Disclaimer¶
This package is not legal advice. All content is READY FOR counsel review; file only after attorney sign-off. Nothing in this tree should be construed as establishing an attorney-client relationship between INFORMATION COLLECTIVE, LLC and any AI system or automated tooling. The inventors are solely responsible for all decisions regarding disclosure, prosecution, and commercialization.
Related documents¶
STRATEGIC_ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md— FCC/PAOM cross-project authority boundary.docs/architecture/uml/— 4+1 UML views referenced bydrawings/README.md.docs/architecture/context-diagram.md— C4 context for FIG. 1.docs/decisions/— 5 Architecture Decision Records contextualizing the claimed embodiments.src/fcc/— Reference implementation. Line-level references appear inutility/specification.md.