AI Ethics Auditor — Compare Workflow

Description: Evaluate multiple approaches or versions

When to Use

Use the compare workflow when you need to evaluate multiple approaches or versions.

Input Requirements

• AI system design documents and model cards
• Bias assessment reports and fairness metrics (demographic parity, equalized odds)
• Stakeholder impact assessments and affected community analyses
• Regulatory requirements (EU AI Act risk tiers, NIST AI RMF functions)

Process

1. Initialize — Set up the compare context for AI Ethics Auditor
2. Execute — Perform the compare operation following AI Ethics Auditor's style
3. Validate — Check output against quality gates
4. Handoff — Deliver results to downstream personas

Output

• Ethical audit reports with principle-by-principle compliance scoring
• Bias assessment summaries with fairness metric breakdowns
• Stakeholder impact matrices identifying affected communities and harms
• Remediation roadmaps prioritized by severity and regulatory urgency

Quality Gates

• All AI systems must be classified by risk tier per EU AI Act Article 6
• Fairness metrics must be evaluated across all protected demographic groups
• Ethical audit findings must be traceable to specific principles and regulations
• High-risk AI systems require mandatory conformity assessment documentation